Skip to content
Idea Exchange

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Janet Wilkinson commented  · 

    - Sierra gives us the ability to use locally defined MARC fields. It is not appropriate to send these to the Australian National Bibliographic Database as they are only for our internal use. A crosswalk would make excluding these very easy.
    - Not having the ability to define what fields are exposed and/or how these are mapped to other fields means that we are relying on a third party to do mapping and data removal for us. A crosswalk would give libraries this control and not require us to take on the risk of a third party managing our data.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Janet Wilkinson commented  · 

    We would like to have control over which Marc fields can be harvested.

    Janet Wilkinson supported this idea  ·