Settings and activity
50 results found
-
36 votes
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Yes, especially in consortia, where multiple libraries' items might be on the same bib - being able to separate them out with record sets would be helpful.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Would also be helpful when tracking down older import jobs that might be responsible for issues discovered later through statistics or other reporting.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
75 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
113 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
This would be great. The 'add a new field' button and 'delete a field' buttons are very close together, and I have accidentally deleted a field, when I meant to add one. There's no way to get that field back without discarding any other changes you may have already made.
-
25 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
I always use the Standard Identifier search in the client - it saves a lot of time when I'm switching between books and DVDs or other materials that use a UPC instead of an ISBN. As the main post says, if you have the search set to IBSN and pop in a UPC, you won't get results, so you have to be double checking you have it set properly. Having a standard identifier option would eliminate this issue.