100 results found
-
Control staff access to the Label Manager in Leap
Label printing can be a limited function in a large library system, using specialized printers to perform the task. Consistency is also important in the spine label. By being able to control access to this utility, it will ensure a better spine label product across a library system.
1 vote -
LEAP Add indicator for open Tabs or Records
Tab session visibility is unclear, leading to records being locked unknowingly by users.
In addition to "hamburger" on upper left-hand side of the screen three horizontal lines.Please add Tab indicators or auto-close function when navigating away.
8 votes -
Automatic deletion of item records
Just as Polaris offers a workflow for the automatic deletion of patron records, introducing a similar feature for item records would be a highly valuable enhancement. The ability to automatically remove items based on defined criteria would streamline operations significantly. Currently, the manual process—such as creating a Record Set and performing bulk deletions—is repetitive and time-consuming. Automating this task would not only improve efficiency but also reduce the administrative burden on staff.
17 votes -
Label Manager Subfields
Please update Label Manager to restrict the Content option of Author from including subfields 0 and 1 when printing. These are relatively new fields for linked data. We would like to retain the data without have to manually deleting it in Label Manager to print pocket labels. They are valid in MARC21 and should be retained to future-proof our records for if and when Polaris makes use of linked data.
9 votes -
Allow for creating links to bib records from within an authority record
This might be coming in 8.0 - it's not on the roadmap, but maybe it's too small to feature there. In the Polaris client, within an authority record, there is an option to create links to bib records (see attached screenshot). This same functionality should also be included in Leap in order for cataloguers to fully switch over to Leap.
27 votes -
Improve label manager
For pocket labels update the author field to exclude new URI fields found in the 100 field (subfields 0 and 1). This should be an easy fix. We want to retain that information in the bibliographic records without having to manually remove them in label manager before printing.
When working with an SL4 or any label type that has a spine and pocket label, allow for alignment to vary between the spine portion and pocket portion. This is important for how we label our picture books. We center align the first 3 letters (with linebreaks) of the author's name. Setting…
5 votes -
Improve ability to share PAC links
Sometimes just sending the URL from the PAC address bar will result in a blank, white screen for the user on the other end. Attached are 2 strategies to offset this but it's a lot to expect staff to know and it would be great if URL links could just be shared with customers without this kind of intervention.
2 votes -
Item template use in Leap
Currently in Leap (we're on 7.8), in order to take full advantage of an item template, you have to click on Actions--Create Item (within the bib record), then add your barcode & select the template you want to use, and then click Save. If you don't click on Save, the template only populates some of the template information. It doesn't change any of the call number fields or the number of renewals, even when the option to use template values is checked.
This is existing functionality in the Polaris toolbar client, and should be in Leap as well. (See attached…
27 votes -
Making Text in On-Order Records a Different Color
We have noticed an uptick in libraries circulating items on on-order records despite it violating consortia policy. We would like to see the text of on-order records (or even just specific fields) be in a different color to help provide a visual indicator of the record type.
9 votes -
Leap - display control numbers in list of current and recent workforms
Right now, the only thing that displays in the list of workforms is the title. When comparing records with the exact same title, this can get confusing and requires too many clicks to make sure you are selecting the correct record. There needs to be more information displayed in addition to the title, and should at minimum have a control number.
16 votes -
Leap - Give the option to overlay a record while comparing multiple MARC records
When comparing bib records in Leap, it would be nice to be able to choose the bib to keep and overlay the other with. This would streamline deduplicating similar records.
19 votes -
Allow staff to view read-only records without needing to cancel the override pop-up
For SHRs and Authorities, if you have read-only access to those records and try to view them, you get an override pop-up. This is happening because it is attempting to open those records in Write mode. To VIEW the record, you have to hit cancel, which is confusing for staff.
For Bib records, it does not work this way. For bib records, you can view them and then if you don't have permission to write or modify them, you get the pop-up when you attempt to save the record.
In the item record if you have view only permissions, it…
12 votes -
Compare record sets side by side
Now that in Leap we can compare bib records side by side, it would be very helpful to be able to compare record sets side by side. Right now I'm exporting contents and comparing in Excel/Google Sheets, and then sometimes importing the results into a new record set. I'd love to be able to see two record sets next to each other and edit as needed directly in Leap. Apologies if this idea has already been submitted. Thanks!
21 votes -
Enable Add from file to bib and item record sets in Polaris client
Polaris client allows staff to populate a patron record set from an xlsx or csv on the local machine. Please enable this capability for item and bib record sets as well.
10 votes -
Bulk edit serial status
Currently, when we need to edit a serial's status, it has to be done one at a time. We have multiple branches that all are scheduled to receive the same issue of a magazine. When the expected issue isn't published, due to a double or special issue instead, we have to edit each serial's status individually to "Never published". Adding serial specific fields where appropriate to bulk item edit would help this.
9 votes -
Replicate LEAP column setting customizations in the client
Cataloging staff using the client have to resize the columns of the find tool results every time they search bibs and items. They also would like to be able to add and remove columns from their default searches. In LEAP, they can add and remove columns and LEAP remembers when they resize a column. This functionality in the client would save them steps.
9 votes -
Add Item Ad Hoc Bulk Change to Polaris client toolbar
Currently Item Ad Hoc Bulk Change is only available on mouse right-click. Please add a toolbar button and/or a keystroke shortcut.
8 votes -
Allow searching by modification date
You should be able to search in the Find Tool by record modification date. So far I'm seeing this missing from Record Sets, Patron Accounts, etc.. This would make it easier to Find Records without having to resort to using SQL which makes it much more accessible to all staff.
17 votes -
Links to Public Access Catalogs from Leap Item Records
In Leap, links to web-based public access catalogs are only available through bib records. It would be convenient if they can also be made accessible through item records.
13 votes -
Permission the volume field on item records
The volume field might seem straightforward, but when it's not standardized—or when anyone can input anything—it quickly becomes a source of frustration, especially with holds and sorting. Imagine a patron placing a hold on “Volume 2,” but one record says “v.2,” another says “Vol 2,” and another just “2”… chaos ensues.
Making that field permission-based could go a long way in preserving data consistency and reducing hold errors. It puts a bit more control in the hands of cataloging staff or system administrators
14 votes
- Don't see your idea?