Bibliographic consistency check when editing bibs
In cleaning up bibliographic data after years of laissez faire cataloguing practice, we have run into a consistent stumbling block that requires us to backtrack. Certain bytes, especially in the 007 and 008 fields appear to require consistency across them to properly read at an item level (we became aware of this when getting red toasts scanning items for a weeding record set, that appeared initially to be in the inclusion criteria).
By way of example: If you input in 007 an 01 byte of 'd - Videodisc', than the 04 byte would have to be 'g' 'h' 's' or 'v' - if it were any other, like 'b - VHS', than the system would flag the error to you upon trying to save bib edits.
This could extend to have the 007 match on key bytes of the 008 field (if the 007 has an 01 byte of 'd - Videodisc' than the 033 byte of 008 would have to be 'v - Videorecording')
If there were a way to have Polaris check control field data in this holistic manner, it would save us having to go into the same bib five or six times trying to figure out which byte is inconsistent with the rest of them.
-
Cameron C
commented
A thought came up recently as to a way this could work--given my being a tech novitiate, I have no clue whether this would be easier or harder than the original conception:
What if, as with the weeding record sets when there are item filters in the template, there were exclamation marks next to each MARC field that indicated there were deficiencies or issues with the data?