Settings and activity
45 results found
-
37 votes
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Would love this - I recently had to make a new pattern and made a mistake in it the first time around, so I had to delete all these newly predicted issues one by one.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
79 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
I've also encountered this issue, specifically with SQL searches where there are multiple conditions (such as local fields or specific subfields) that aren't accessible with the regular search.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Yes, this is very frustrating, especially if it's large record set. If you're adding or removing records piecemeal as you find the ones you need, having to reload the record set after every change is very annoying.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Yes, the whole point of sorting is to better see ALL the records grouped in whatever way you sorted. If you're only sorting what appears on the first page, it's not an accurate reflection of what's in the record set.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
While you can directly edit the 006, 007, and 008, they do not automatically overwrite like it does in the client. Because they are fixed fields with a standardized number of characters, it would be easier for experienced cataloguers to just type what needs to be there, rather than deleting the correct number of characters or opening the workform.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Would love this feature! Since formats/TOMs are currently hierarchical and may have multiple ways to create them (eg in the 006, the 007, the LDR, the 008 or a combo of all of these), it's not always easy to tell if you made the correct change, or made all the changes you need to get the format you want. It would be much easier to tell if the fix is working if you could see the change in format right in the bib, rather than opening a duplicate check or going back to refreshed search results.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Yes, currently if I have a big record set and want to filter by year, I might still get results where a number is in the title or author dates. Filtering by column would (I assume) allow multiple filters as well, if you need to narrow even more, such as by date and material type or whatnot.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
A history of notifications/errors would also be helpful in tracking how frequently an issue is occurring, when, and to what user. Also helpful to re-find the message if it fades too quickly to write it down or get a screenshot, especially if you aren't expecting something to go wrong.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
38 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesAlexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alexis Schaffer
commented
Personally I think the main bib should be locked if you are editing it in the compare tool. That being said, it is nice to be able to go back and see item details in the bib, which are not available in the compare tool. But maybe the bib could still be locked for editing if you have the compare tool open? Likewise, I think if you've made edits in the bib and go to open the compare tool, there should be a pop-up telling you to save, or indicating that the changes made won't show up in the compare unless you save first.
Alexis Schaffer
supported this idea
·
Yes, issues are similar to items in this sense and should be able to bulk adjusted. You also cannot bulk delete multiple issues, which would be handy when a pattern changes or when you make a mistake when creating a new pattern.