Skip to content
Innovative Idea Exchange

Settings and activity

100 results found

  1. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    We have a lot of monthly dashboards that are based on monthly exports from Decision Center and the lack of a consistent output from one month to the next has caused a lot of extra work on our end to cleanup.

    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  3. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    There's a limited version of a report like this hiding in the turnover by owning location and item type report. Once that runs there's a toggle to allow you to switch between a turnover view, a circ total view, and an item count count.

    Since Decision Center uses daily data extracts run overnight instead of live data I'm not sure it's the tool to use for building in a current status filter. For that you could probably Statistics within Sierra instead.

  5. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  6. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  7. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    The only way to do something like this currently is via the API's, which require you to have a developer on staff and from my experience is generally a lot more limited (and risky) to use for batch updates. Adding this to scheduler would greatly improve Sierra's capabilities merely by taking advantage of the infrastructure that's already present in the system.

    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    There is an hourly circulation by transaction type report in Decision Center. Do you need a version of this that breaks transactions out by stat group / terminal?

  9. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein shared this idea  · 
  10. 40 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    We have received sooooooo many complaints about this system behavior over the years. Staff have had to waste an inordinate amount of time on deduping the produced lists, which has only gotten worse with the introduction of the pagination issue (SIERRA-38727) that was introduced in 6.0.

    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  11. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    This is nice from a patron service standpoint but I know some of our member libraries would object given space constraints on their hold shelves not to mention the wasted labor on the part of staff retrieving the item and likely sending it through delivery.

    I can certainly see the value for other libraries but this would really need to be an optional feature that organizations like us could opt out of.

    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  12. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    These errors will occasionally show up in the client too so this is a bit broader of an issue than just the sql views.

    There’s a glitch with the self checkout feature in our mobile app where if an item is rapidly scanned twice it doesn’t get checked out correctly and the only reason we know about that is the items wind up with a due date of 1969.

    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  13. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  LX Starter  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeremy Goldstein commented  · 

    Yes, here is the enhancement on the LX Starter roadmap https://portal.productboard.com/iii/15-vega-product-portal/c/397-default-journeys

    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  14. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    UNDER REVIEW  ·  2 comments  ·  LX Starter  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  15. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    UNDER REVIEW  ·  1 comment  ·  LX Starter  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  16. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  17. 50 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  18. 75 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  19. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  LX Starter  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
  20. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea  · 
1 2 3 5 Next →