Settings and activity
371 results found
-
10 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesUNDER REVIEW · 0 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesUNDER REVIEW · 3 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesUNDER REVIEW · 3 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
11 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
38 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lynn Reynish
commented
This would bring an excellent amount of flexibility to the patron record display. As a member of a varied consortium, I'd ask that this be configurable at the Library level, not just the System level. We're different enough to have varied needs here.
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lynn Reynish
commented
Agreed! We have SSO enabled for a number of products and none of them prompt for a Microsoft log out. That's unnecessary and we wouldn't want this either and would dearly love to use SSO (we're in a complex consortium).
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesLynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I can see why your consortium would value this - but we would prefer that this feature be added as a togglable option. We also have customers that own multiple properties in our consortium - but our consortium (and us in particular) enforces a one-card-per-customer requirement, even in that circumstance. So we do merge customers in that situation and want to go on doing so without alerts that are spurious to us.