Settings and activity
342 results found
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
10 votesUNDER REVIEW · 0 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
26 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
Aside from the very poor security this is in general, which has been noted well by others, this is also not useful from a consortium perspective. Managing an ILS in a consortium is a lot of work and it functions better when the member library systems can access appropriate areas of SA to do their work and take some of the load off of the consortium office. Web Administration needs to accommodate consortia!