Settings and activity
474 results found
-
13 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lynn Reynish
commented
In the context of bibs and authorities, I think that the records should open in view mode by default and then there should be a button / toggle that allows you to edit. At that point, an override should pop-up if necessary. Everyone should be able to see bibs and authorities.
From a system-wide perspective, I'd prefer it if everything opened in view mode by default, whether it's bib records, item records, funds, administration tables, everything. There should still be options to not allow people to even look at certain areas but that should be rarer.
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lynn Reynish
commented
I like the permissions-based idea for this because we have staff that very much need to see deleted items when searching - but that definitely is not most staff.
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lynn Reynish
commented
I have to say that I find this to be a bug - not an enhancement. Silent errors are a programming fault / oversight that needs to be fixed not some new feature that customers should have to request.
If you were asking for greater logging for reporting purposes or for an audit trail then I could understand seeing it as an enhancement, but this is in no way the same thing.
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Lynn Reynish
supported this idea
·
We do something similar in PowerBI outside of Polaris (we don't have full access to custom tables as that is restricted to our consortium). This was a fair amount of work to initially set up in PowerBI but it works OK for us. This idea would be a lot simpler.