Skip to content
Innovative Idea Exchange

Settings and activity

8 results found

  1. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jenn Del Cegno commented  · 

    The wording should both be clearer that is appearing because the record patron is open in more than one interface and written in language that is appropriate for the staff end-user.
    The users that see this pop-up are circulation staff that can include part-time, student workers, and sub workers. The meaning of warning message and the outcome of confirming OK vs override should be spelled out.
    So something like

    "Patron record is open in another interface ('login detail') and locked from processing payments until 'x date/time'. Confirm OK to proceed or Override to release the payment lock now."

    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  · 
  3. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jenn Del Cegno commented  · 

    As a consortium it is a repeated issue that we are the maximum saved searches and exports, and struggle to determine a fair way to empty saved parameters when we do not which are currently in use. Including a Last Used timestamp would be helpful in applying the same rules we use for clearing out old review files.

  4. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  · 
  5. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  · 
  7. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  · 
  8. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jenn Del Cegno supported this idea  ·