Settings and activity
84 results found
-
4 votes
Susan Millwater
shared this idea
·
-
32 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
125 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Susan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Susan Millwater
commented
I have written many custom reports to weed out renewals from stats since it is the first time circulation that is important for understanding usage of material. It would be a game changer to have the renewals count as a separate field in the item.
Susan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Susan Millwater
commented
I have some queries to determine who should be deleted and have to use the modification date in addition to the last activity date so that I don't delete a patron whose registration was recently updated and/or had a note added (evictions from premises). I'm not sure I'd want the last activity date to be updated since we use 3 years for no activity, but I only use a little over a year for last modification to determine which records to delete.
-
10 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Susan Millwater
commented
Staff use this feature in the staff client all the time. It is time-consuming to have to create a record set to be able to print the results from a find tool search.
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Susan Millwater
commented
We've struggled with this limitation for years. Floating by collection is important/necessary for some items, whereas, floating by material type is better for others. Also, we're in a consortium and it is a systemwide setting. Not all member libraries have the same philosophy about floating so it is problematic.
Susan Millwater
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesSusan Millwater
supported this idea
·
I like the idea of a new status. Another possibility is adding a new field that would give you more flexibility with what to do with the item when it is checked in. You could have it be a temporary On Display so on check in it would just go back to In/Shelving Cart or permanent which would cause it to go back to On Display. I'm not sure if another value needs to be added to account for libraries with floating collections or not.