Settings and activity
142 results found
-
7 votes
Elizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
103 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesElizabeth Wright
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Wright
commented
Please. Customers want to print out their lists, and want to select "all" rather than be limited to 5 items on a page. If they could see "all" then they could use the browser to print out their lists. This would apply to checkouts, holds, and reading history.
Elizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Wright
commented
There would definitely be a number of ways to do this, but I don’t think staff would want to respond to a prompt at each check-in. Instead, I’m envisioning something that builds on the existing hold pickup location model.
1. Each branch could be assigned a configurable maximum number of duplicate titles allowed on the shelf. (eg. Larger branches might allow 3–4 copies, while smaller branches might allow only 2).
2. At check-in, if the number of duplicates on the shelf exceeds that maximum, the system would automatically determine where to send the copy using the priority established in a table similar to the hold pickup location.
What is fantastic about the hold pickup location table is that priority can be based on a randomized group of locations or individual branches.
3. The system would never redirect a copy to a branch that already has it on the shelf unless everyone has a copy. In that scenario, the maximum number of duplicates would be checked by the system.
Elizabeth Wright
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesElizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Wright
commented
This would be helpful when the Technical Services department generates a list of items to retrieve and needs to place item-level holds on them. In these cases, all holds would share the same pickup location.
-
8 votesElizabeth Wright
shared this idea
·
-
43 votes
I apologize for the erroneous update. The change we made in Nov/Dec of 2024 did not actually deliver the requested functionality in this idea request. Changing status back to Under Review.
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Wright
commented
I just opened a ticket about this thinking Vega was broken as well. If customers take the initiative to limit the result to a branch location, WHY would they want to include ALL eResources. That just doesn't make sense. Please exclude eResource materials if the Branch location is selected. That is a physical location (in the branch), and not an eLocation.
Elizabeth Wright
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesElizabeth Wright
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesElizabeth Wright
shared this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth Wright
commented
Yes - # of holds, # of available copies, and total copies is what our customers have asked for.
-
4 votesElizabeth Wright
shared this idea
·
We find that teenagers and children want to get rid of those old titles they read when they were younger. Also, those that have moved past a medical illness also want to remove the titles from long ago.