Settings and activity
53 results found
-
49 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
shared this idea
·
-
15 votes
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lloyd Chittenden
commented
I don't know anything about this at all, but it sounds like an important best practice.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lloyd Chittenden
commented
For our consortia, we probably can't let members have SQL access without being able to limit information by scopes and account units. So this would be useful to us.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lloyd Chittenden
commented
I'd still want the option of copying to a review file.
-
26 votes
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Lloyd Chittenden
commented
**** straight. We shouldn't vote on bugs. Bugs should just get fixed.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
We are a consortium with a very similar problem. Our members have different requesting policies on things, particularly DVDs. Some of them don't allow holds and others do. If one of the non-holdable libraries gets the first copy, then it will shut down requests on that title for the whole system until another library gets a copy, regardless of the fact that there are order records from libraries that do allow holds, and want people to be able to put on holds.
We have implemented a very clunky work around. This suggestion would be a huge improvement.