Settings and activity
71 results found
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
I don't know what key-based authentication is, but EBSCO Discovery Service uses mft addresses. I have them working in Scheduler. I don't know about Data Exchange. I never send directly from Data Exchange. I've only saved to desktop, then send with some other software.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
For those with IT who won't let you use the old Jaspersoft, I would point out that you can edit a jrxml file with notepad++. It's a pain, but then so is Jaspersoft.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
We have also had employees engage in malicious activity, like deleting items to implement their personal censorship. Logs of staff activity would have been invaluable.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
Most of our libraries don't use ICODE1 at all because keeping track of what they mean is a pain. However, I would point out that this would require all the libraries in a consortium to agree on what the codes mean. As it is, each one can make them mean whatever they want. I suppose if you can't agree, then you could leave them blank, and those who can agree could label them.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
You can do this now with the load profiles. I suppose if you don't have access to load profiles, it would be nice to be able to do this from within a record.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
It is also possible to do this with a JSON like this:
{
"target": {
"record": {
"type": "bib"
},
"field": {
"marcTag": "020"
}
},
"expr": {
"op": "not_exists",
"operands": [
"",
""
]
}
}But come on, the system can clearly do this. It should be easily available in the interface.
-
5 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
If they did add another digit, then you could get to 19 codes at 262144. Adding together all 19 codes would get you to 524288, and you would need still another digit to go farther. Maybe moving from 15 codes to 19 isn't enough of an improvement to be worth the difficulty of adding another digit.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
I realize further that the point of a system of codes doubling the number before is that you can add them together to make combined codes. They cut off at 32767 because that allows you to add up all of them together. If you added 32768, then adding together all the codes would get you to 131071, which would require another digit, which could be hard depending on what's going on in the background.
An error occurred while saving the comment Lloyd Chittenden
commented
I see that's not a random number. If you want to use a system where each code is two times the previous code (which can be very useful, and I can't really see any other reason to need even the number they already provide), then this limit only allows you 15 codes. The 16th one would be 32768. It seems strange to cut it off there, at one number before you could have a 16th code. Even if they did increase to 99999, then you would only get a 17th at 65536.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Sierra » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesLloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Sierra » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the product management team for possible inclusion in a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
This idea will be reviewed for consideration as an enhancement in an upcoming release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Lloyd Chittenden
supported this idea
·
This would be useful in cataloging as well. Mostly you use the copyright and phonograph copyright symbols, but is is a real pain that those two are on completely different character groups. If I could have a custom thing I could open that would just have those two that get used all the time, it would be really nice.