Settings and activity
144 results found
-
53 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 4 comments · ILS - Sierra » Cataloging & Metadata Management · Admin →
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
31 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 3 comments · ILS - Sierra » Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Our public services staff sure would appreciate this. We have notes in patron records about this (ex. "Does NOT want due slip," etc.), and it would be so much easier to just default to the patron's preference. It's fine if it's global at first (set to email or print) but once you change it, there should be a checkbox or something to keep that setting for that specific patron ongoing. Simply check/uncheck if they change their mind later.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 2 comments · ILS - Sierra » Cataloging & Metadata Management · Admin →Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
My only comment to this is that only the top level administrator and the creator of the load would be allowed to delete. I wouldn't want someone to accidentally delete something.
-
33 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 1 comment · ILS - Sierra » Cataloging & Metadata Management · Admin →Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
This idea has been reviewed with Engineering and could be implemented as a small project. Product Management will keep this issue under consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
I would add that I wish the pagination was also at the bottom of the screen, not just the top. When I am trying to edit users, which are more than one page, I have to scroll back up to the top to click to the next page, which is nuts.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
This idea will be kept under consideration for a future release.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
This enhancement is planned for Sierra 6.2.
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Our tech services/cataloging staff would love this, especially as we're in the midst of combining our DVDs of television shows from episodes to seasons (think Midsummer Murders). Maybe it's tied to a permission?
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
This idea will be kept under consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Yes, when checking in items, you are presented with a popup telling you about the current status of the item and asking do you want to check it in, Yes/No. Yes, that's why you're in checkin mode, so seems redundant to ask this. Then, if the item needs to go in transit, you are presented with another popup asking do you want to print transit slip, Yes/No. In our case, we don't print transit slips, so that's a No. These 2 popups require clicking for EVERY ITEM BEING CHECKED IN. Imagine you have a stack of items from another location and are checking them in at your location, all need to go in transit.
Ideally with this and/or any popup, there would be the option to keep your selection for the remainder of your session.
I kind of feel like this was covered back when we had the popup challenge...?
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 3 comments · ILS - Sierra » Cataloging & Metadata Management · Admin →Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
If you could limit the search by "available," (following requesting rules, etc.), that would help.
-
66 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
This would certainly save a lot of time. Would also like to be able to open the patron record (and edit) from a review file.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 2 comments · ILS - Sierra » Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
With the current limits (4 categories!), and the large variety of items we have that we want to include limits on (adult card or limit to only 1), we are running into issues where patrons want to check out 2 types of item, each with a "1 only" limit.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
63 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
This idea has been reviewed with Engineering and could be implemented as a medium-sized project. Product Management will keep this issue under consideration for a future release.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Ideally some sort of checkbox situation, like you see when you view your email and want to delete, etc. You could check all or select specific loan rules and then update a specific field/setting all at once.
-
34 votes
This idea has been reviewed with Engineering and could be implemented as a medium-sized project. Product Management will keep this issue under consideration for a future release.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 1 comment · ILS - Sierra » Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment · Admin →Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
There already is a way to make this happen but it is manual - you have to manually cancel hold that have expired (we have a "zombie frozen hold procedure"), confirm they get the appropriate hold cancellation notice, and then when you run cancelled holds/clear holdshelf, expired holds, they will get a notice for that. Having Sierra do that automatically, like any other notice (overdue, courtesy, etc.), would certainly save time.
-
56 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Are you talking about the icons for the Sierra client software? If so, then yes, we need some up to date icons. With the WebPAC, you can show your own versions (but why should you have to create a bunch of icons), but you're stuck with what III supplies for the Sierra software.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
This idea will be kept under consideration for a future release.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
Alison Pruntel
shared this idea
·
-
37 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 3 comments · ILS - Sierra » Cataloging & Metadata Management · Admin →Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
Alison Pruntel
shared this idea
·
-
14 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 0 comments · ILS - Sierra » Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment · Admin →Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesFUTURE POSSIBILITIES (IDEA LAB) · 0 comments · ILS - Sierra » Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment · Admin →Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
Yes, I would appreciate this functionality. I try and emphasize to people running lists to make an educated guess as to how many records to expect, but they shouldn't have to do so. The management of the review files should just be easier in general. You get a certain number and they resize accordingly, vs. having to go in randomly and balance (create more files with only 500 records, etc.).