Settings and activity
189 results found
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
22 votes
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
For staff users, correct? At least if the Knowledge Base pointed to what support provided me in a ticket about this:
When you get a question about a cover image, start by right-clicking on the cover image and selecting "Open image in new tab." The image's URL will then display in the browser bar. Check whether it includes a UPC, because Syndetics will use the UPC first. If there's just an ISBN, and the ISBN is correct, and it's still showing the wrong cover, then that's reportable to Syndetics. And yes, you can send them an email to get their data corrected. See "Data Corrections" on this page.
https://proquest.syndetics.com/contact/
Please send an email at syndetics.corrections@proquest.com and make sure to include the ISBN/UPC/ISSN/EAN of the title in question.
-
22 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Agree with Eileen!
-
24 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Doesn't this depend on your Location hierarchy settings (under Settings | Library defaults | Location hierarchy)? We have Level 1 as Branch and Level 2 as Shelf Location and thus that displays as expected. Maybe that doesn't work for Consortiums that have at least 3 levels?
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Is this a Polaris-only thing? We are a Sierra library, and when you click on Forgot PIN (the link is taking you to /pinreset used by our old WebPAC), you do get the message that the email doesn't exist.
-
26 votes
This is a bug and we are pursuing a fix for this problem as a Relevancy bug. Will update this record when a fix has been applied.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Anything in the 505s needs to display in a logical spot (not under the "i" in Edition Information), so short stories, etc.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
I would want this to be optional. While at first I wanted it (it displays in classic WebPAC), I then realized that it's cut down on patrons asking repeatedly about items close to or slightly overdue, as they focus on the due date ("that should have been returned last week!"). They now just see it checked out and place a hold vs. not placing a hold and pestering staff.
-
31 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Yes, disable renew button if renewals not allowed (whatever the reason)
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Sierra/WebPAC had the somewhat lame preferred search option, so you'd get an email alert when something you tagged (author, subject) was added to the collection, but very rudimentary. I would like a better version of that, but not for holds to be placed automatically. My concern is about the build up of holds (which people forget about). Definitely make it optional to place a hold automatically (option for library to make that an available option for patron, who must opt-in).