Settings and activity
49 results found
-
72 votesUNDER REVIEW · 11 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesUNDER REVIEW · 4 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
105 votesSarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesUNDER REVIEW · 3 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
50 votesUNDER REVIEW · 3 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Sarah St. Martin
commented
Labels frequently get discontinued, and libraries then have to choose a new one and decide if they want to relabel the old ones so they all match or not. Also, sometimes the labels available are not that appealing (I remember one library getting frustrated at the lack of parenting labels), and being able to decide on your own image solves both of these issues.
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesSarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesSarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
59 votesSarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesSarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
This is essential. We are still on 7.2 (upgrading soon to 7.4) so have not been able to do manual acquisitions, and have not experienced this yet. However I know staff will consider this another reason not to use Leap for cataloging/acquisitions as it would be considered lost functionality. Adding collection and fund information for each POLI/INLI would add so much time!