Settings and activity
92 results found
-
67 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
49 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
56 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Sarah St. Martin
commented
As more of our libraries begin using the 970 field to bulk add records to POs, this limitation is becoming a significant barrier to efficient workflows, especially in a consortium environment where full bib records often already exist and contain multiple ISBNs.
Staff frequently need to review and adjust the ISBN in the POLI. This extra step slows the process and increases the chance of errors. Selecting the wrong ISBN can result in ordering the incorrect format or the order being rejected by the vendor if the ISBN doesn't exist in their system. These errors create additional cleanup work that negates the intended efficiency of using the bulk-add process in the first place.
Addressing this issue would make the 970 workflow viable for a much larger number of libraries, greatly improving ordering accuracy and efficiency across the consortium.
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
78 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Sarah St. Martin
supported this idea
·
Our catalogers use this all the time in the client, and it's a factor in them not using Leap for creating POs.