Settings and activity
36 results found
-
8 votes
Joyce Peter
shared this idea
·
-
129 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
10 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesUNDER REVIEW · 3 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
33 votesUNDER REVIEW · 0 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesUNDER REVIEW · 0 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Joyce Peter
commented
One of our former circ staff members used bulk change to erase the collection code on around 1,500 item records and that was not an easy thing to clean up as it involved dozens of collections. One of the reference staff has changed the ownership field when using bulk change-- and done it more than once even after receiving an admonition from me. I have more examples of unfortunate batch changes, but the bottom line is that if the catalogers or sys admin doesn't want staff to have the ability the modify a single item record-- they certainly shouldn't be allowed to modify thousands through a backdoor.
-
64 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
We actually added an endpoint to support this integration in Polaris 7.6 (BibsPost). We've been working with BTCat to consume the endpoint in their application.
I'm going to set this to "Planned" for now because the integration is not live with BTCat yet. But the development piece required for Polaris has been done. Please let BTCat know you are interested!!
Joyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesJoyce Peter
supported this idea
·
I also use LAD when gathering inactive patron records to remove. Adding card renewal to the list of activities that modify the LAD is fine; but I wouldn't want just the act of saving a record to trigger an update. Staff may have added a note or done a bulk change that has nothing to do with the patron having actually used the library.