Settings and activity
39 results found
-
19 votes
Courtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
22 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
33 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
35 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesUNDER REVIEW · 6 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Courtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesUNDER REVIEW · 10 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Courtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
57 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
58 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
67 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
-
88 votesCourtney DeSear
supported this idea
·
This would save SO much staff time, Lynn's description sounds magical. It would mean we don't have to keep separate files of requests or sort through forms outside the ILS to track down who wanted what. We also tend to get a lot of purchase requests that should have been ILLs, and vice versa, so having this sort of form built in where multiple staff could check it routinely would be amazing. We have also had MANY patrons over the years who want an automated response letting them know what happened to their request, and currently we don't have the bandwidth to respond to each and every one. We encourage frontline staff to tell them if we are able to get it we'll place it on hold for them; but this is obviously not ideal.