Settings and activity
6 results found
-
138 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Paul Costa
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Paul Costa
commented
Just today, I myself failed to notice the need to click the apply button at the bottom of the column, so I definitely think auto-applying the filters would be helpful.
Paul Costa
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Paul Costa
commented
Not only will "looking like spam" hurt our ability to get patrons to read the individual notices, but marking emails as spam often enough could lead to email services taking action against us. https://support.google.com/a/answer/14229414
Paul Costa
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
-
85 votesPaul Costa
supported this idea
·
-
147 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Paul Costa
commented
Alphabetical organization of our various libraries is the only consistent way to provide this useful filter to our patrons.
Paul Costa
supported this idea
·
Without the ability to remedy an unwarranted block on sending emails to certain patrons, they are bound to miss important account information, such as holds ready for pickup, leading to delayed or cleared holds, which would likely be called back again when the patron learns of the missed hold. Besides the obvious impact on patrons, this also increases the number of items going through our transit system, which almost certainly carries a noticeable cost to our library system. We literally cannot afford to waste vital resources because of an email issue.