Settings and activity
122 results found
-
24 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein commented
We encounter this quite a bit in our system as well and it is a cause of problems for patrons and confusion for staff.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
23 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Jeremy Goldstein shared this idea ·
-
33 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein commented
Without the ability to scan items in batch, I've found little incentive to use RFID over the phone's camera for scanning barcodes. There are certainly device limitations in play that would make this unhelpful for many users, but if you do have access to a peripheral such as the one @Shawn shared then adding batch scanning would enormously improve this system.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein commented
I never understood why this report didn't include the primary identification point for the invoices it lists out. All invoices are generally referenced by the number assigned by the vendor that produced them and not the internal to Sierra voucher number.
There may be systems where those vouchers are used for something but I've been working with acquisitions with various libraries for nearly 20 years and haven't found one yet who did.Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein commented
The lack of this feature is precisely the reason that our consortia opted to not move to LX Starter at this point in time. We love the editor and really want to be able to utilize this product but until centralized notices are available we simply cannot use this product.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Jeremy Goldstein shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Jeremy Goldstein shared this idea ·
-
32 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein commented
The hold table doesn't currently store that information beyond the timestamps for when it was placed and when it was placed on a holdshelf if that's occurred...but the circ_trans table does include the application_name and stat_group_code_num from when the holds are first placed.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein commented
@Semane Rachid There is currently an item on the Sierra Product board (listed under upcoming so it's not targeted for a particular release yet) pertaining to pickup locker support. That's another location to provide additional feedback to help make this happen https://portal.productboard.com/iii/6-innovative-product-status-board-new/c/501-support-lockers-for-hold-pickup
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeremy Goldstein commented
This really would make working with the APIs a lot easier an improved prospect and be a big step toward fulfilling the promise of opening up the system.
Jeremy Goldstein supported this idea ·
This is a critical issue, but also one that is far larger than this specific use case and I'm guessing has impacts on all dates and timestamps present anywhere in the system. For reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem