Settings and activity
369 results found
-
3 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
5 votesUNDER REVIEW · 2 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Lynn Reynish commented
Clarivate has said they want to internationalize the Polaris-based products. Well - here's an opportunity! Handle different tax schemes properly.
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lynn Reynish commented
Aside from the very poor security this is in general, which has been noted well by others, this is also not useful from a consortium perspective. Managing an ILS in a consortium is a lot of work and it functions better when the member library systems can access appropriate areas of SA to do their work and take some of the load off of the consortium office. Web Administration needs to accommodate consortia!
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
26 votesUNDER REVIEW · 2 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
18 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
-
11 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
-
16 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
23 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
31 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
Agreed! Rapid Update and Global Update in Sierra are much more powerful than Polaris Bulk Change. I get that we could, theoretically, use SQL in Polaris but why go that route when tools should be available in the clients?