Settings and activity
29 results found
-
58 votes
Liz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
For the withdrawn example, does this really require custom circulation statuses? Or just a way to indicate/query the reason an item was withdrawn?
The reason Polaris has traditional restricted circulation statuses is because of our automated processes around certain statuses. Using the withdrawn example, our automatic Lost/Missing to Withdrawn processing would not know about custom statuses or which one to use.
If we reworked this enhancement as needing to be able to track/report on withdrawn reasons, we could plan for that within the automated processes.
Liz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
134 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Liz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
61 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Liz Mason
commented
Hi Gabrielle,
Yes, changing that setting to 9999 would be helpful, we are discussing it with our cataloging group now.
It would also be nice to have the history indicate more than "Modified by Cataloging." If it could indicate the type of change- collection, shelf location, price, home branch, material type, etc. that would be especially helpful.
Liz Mason
shared this idea
·
-
24 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Liz Mason
commented
This would be very helpful and appreciated. It would be great to have this automatic filter applied to the record sets drop-down lists as well.
-
38 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesLiz Mason
shared this idea
·
-
28 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
53 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesLiz Mason
supported this idea
·
It would also be very helpful to us if we could define TOMS. For example, our Vision Resource library would like "Tactile Graphic" to display as opposed to "2 Dimensional Non-Projected Graphic" or "Three dimensional Object (Artifact)." This enhancement would be great for libraries that have unique collections.