Settings and activity
216 results found
-
18 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
59 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
17 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesUNDER REVIEW · 5 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
18 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
23 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
This part especially for us: "When items are suppressed in an older work because of being lost, damaged, missing, or withdrawn, it also doesn't make sense that the title should show up in Vega as On Order as this may not be true!"
We don't have "order records" as we are a consortium - we only have "on order items" so if we were to extrapolate from that, then an "order record" would be any record for which all items attached were in a status of "Being Acquired" or "In-Process".
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Definitely! We have a lot of older records that don't have summaries, but sometimes Syndetics will have those summaries instead, and in the old PAC, patrons could see those Syndetics summaries. We have Syndetics Unbound in both places, so I'm not sure why we can't see summaries in Vega.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
There are many examples of when the name of an author/contributor as pictured on the item, listed in the 245 $c, is different from the version in the authorized 1xx or 7xx field. As such, the 245 $c needs to be indexed for searching, since that is what patrons are more likely to search by - they have no idea about authorized versions of names in LC, much less what they would be for any given author/contributor. Additionally, a recent example illustrated to us that even when they are very close to what the authorized name is, they could still miss finding what they need - searching "AJ Pearce" as pictured on the item doesn't retrieve the same results as when searching "A. J. Pearce", which is the authorized version. A patron wouldn't know this.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Yes we are using Declare Damaged from 7.5