Settings and activity
276 results found
-
6 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
55 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
35 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Wes, that's a great idea! Our consortium doesn't use damaged check-in, but if we did I would vote for that idea.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Gabrielle, our consortium does have the Lost Item Transition in place also - but staff would like to be able to do it 'ad hoc' as well, prior to the transition, as needed.
-
73 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Another idea here might be to allow the 130 field to be considered in the roll-up logic for JUST movies (240/130 was removed from consideration in roll-up logic because of issues it caused with print titles) so that catalogers could enter the "uniform" movie title there and trigger the roll-up that way. (The 130 field does provide disambiguation for works with the same name by including the year.)
-
13 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
108 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
This would be extremely helpful for our consortium! (We might even be ok with an In Transit to Withdrawn transition instead.)
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
This text should either be changed across the board for everyone or we should be allowed to edit it. Wording in the old PAC is definitely better, as it actually explains to the patron what the issue is. The current wording is vague and misleading.