Settings and activity
17 results found
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Sara
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sara
commented
We aren't coming from a system where we've ever been able to see patron curated lists, but the patron assist potential of such a feature would be astronomically beneficial.
Sara
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sara
commented
There are certainly instances where patron misunderstandings can prompt a little lesson from staff on use of the catalog, but this issue feels like something that is more directly misleading than simply misunderstood. If an item is just numbered on a publisher's list of "classic titles", say, it is not part of any larger series. Patrons seeing a number might wonder what they are missing when it is purely a listing error.
Sara
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sara
commented
I feel like, as library staff in general, our default setting, (certainly mentally!) is alphabetical!
Sara
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sara
commented
Being able to break out individual permissions based on need and level at many libraries, all with differing staffing, allows the best fit for everyone.
Sara
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sara
commented
The possibilities for record sets have so much potential, but they are still at this stage very rigid in their functionality. Having more options relating to record sets and smoother operation of the functions would open so many doors: Reader's advisory, book club tracking, seasonal and high interest topics in the news, and so much more.
Sara
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
70 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
68 votesSara
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Sara
commented
As a frequent catalog list user as well as library employee, I would be devastated if I lost lists just because I needed to update my library card number. The most logical solution is definitely to tie this information to the patron ID number rather than an impermanent card barcode.
-
24 votesSara
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesSara
supported this idea
·
Our library DOES have the ability to send text messages, but we are considering limiting patrons to still only having one form of contact without offering an additional text. (Budget concerns- phone calls and text cost the library, email is free.) By removing this option, it is more clear to staff, and currently the option does show up for online registrations, and removing it from that initial contact would streamline that shift.