Settings and activity
86 results found
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
I'm putting the keywords Quick Search and Omnibox, Omni box and Omni Search in this comment for future reference when we go trying to find this.
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
This would be a wonderful addition for power users of the Leap and offer a nice transition for power users of the desktop client.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
This would be lovely to have in Leap! Along with an icon or glyph to clear the entry, which would improve upon the staff desktop client experience.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesWes Osborn
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
I also wish we could bypass the workstation portion all together. I wonder if allowing us to pass in a branch and workstation via the URL could also be considered.
-
Give staff ID of duplicate user when staff account username or external ID matches one in the system
4 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
It would be great to have this type of feature - even better if it supported regex. It is one of the items that prevents us from moving fully to hosted because this is something we can do via SQL Updates today.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Or make this information available via an API so we can monitor it using our own 3rd party monitoring tools.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
This would be very important to us. We've been working on ways to make our series more accessible and only showing some series information will limit Vega's adoption for our organization.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Although this isn't as slick, you can use simplyreports to create reports that would contain this data that could be scheduled to run and then sent to a 3rd party.
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Although it is hinted at, adding another area where this PII data is stored: https://ideas.iii.com/forums/951742-ils-polaris/suggestions/50203572-add-support-for-automated-clearing-of-the-polaris
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
I will note that this is supported in hardware with some of the receipt printers:
-
34 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
@Lynn - The common situation we see is that the item is returned to the library through a CKI action. Then the library is surprised to see it not trigger any local holds. It will turn out that an item from another location is being shipped to fill the hold instead. So, the location where the local hold is at goes back to sit on the shelf (or shipped out to another library) while the hold request is later filled by the item that is received through shipping.
I think we've told libraries that using Fill Now is one workaround for this.
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Although we've gotten used to this over the past decade, having this as an option in the ILS would likely greatly improve patron (and staff) satisfaction. Even though would cause some unneeded shipping, which is why having a toggle/setting for it would be nice.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Could you clarify a bit what you mean by "the most efficient hold preference setting". Which preference setting are you referring to?
-
11 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
One downside is the stronger boarders might seem to indicate something would be a required "area" but I'd probably be OK with trade off.