Seperate Hold Preference Settings for Primary and Secondary Sequences
In a consortium setting or just a large, multi-branch, library system, the most efficient hold preference setting may not be the same for both sequences.
We currently have to pick the hold preference setting that is necessary to meet our consortium’s policies in the secondary sequence, but is redundant in the primary sequence. It would improve patron experience and reduce unnecessary shipping if we could impose different settings for each of the sequences.
8
votes
AdminEleanor Crumblehulme
(Admin, Innovative)
shared this idea
-
Wes Osborn
commented
Could you clarify a bit what you mean by "the most efficient hold preference setting". Which preference setting are you referring to?
-
Arwen Rudolph
commented
Shipping is a huge expense. We could cut costs and get holds into the hands of our patrons faster with this change!
-