Seperate Hold Preference Settings for Primary and Secondary Sequences
In a consortium setting or just a large, multi-branch, library system, the most efficient hold preference setting may not be the same for both sequences.
We currently have to pick the hold preference setting that is necessary to meet our consortium’s policies in the secondary sequence, but is redundant in the primary sequence. It would improve patron experience and reduce unnecessary shipping if we could impose different settings for each of the sequences.
Eleanor Crumblehulme
shared this idea
In accordance with the Idea Graduation Workflow guidelines agreed upon by Innovative and IUG, this idea has been closed because it was submitted more than two years ago and has not been selected for inclusion in the product.
This idea is still available for commenting but is no longer eligible for voting.
Ideas that were submitted three or more years ago are archived for future reference.
-
Wes Osborn
commented
Could you clarify a bit what you mean by "the most efficient hold preference setting". Which preference setting are you referring to?
-
Arwen Rudolph
commented
Shipping is a huge expense. We could cut costs and get holds into the hands of our patrons faster with this change!
-