Settings and activity
106 results found
-
7 votes
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
30 votesWes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
10 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
105 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
With Excel online not being able to parse the current files this is becoming a bigger and bigger issue. At least allowing for CSV as an output type would really help!
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
28 votesUNDER REVIEW · 4 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
While this would certainly be an improvement and would offer clearer signaling and a better UI for staff, we accomplish something similar by limiting permissions for system level owned record sets so that they can't be deleted.
I think one consideration here is that if you could still go through and remove every record from the record set, what benefits do you get by being able to keep the record set "shell" in place?
In our case, we need the shell because we have some automation around handling bounce backs and some tooling for an automated holds service, but I suspect that other folks wouldn't have such automations in place.
Again, I would like to see this, but if you struggle with this today you might consider doing some permissions finagling to see if you could get yourself part (most) of the way there today.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
One downside is the stronger boarders might seem to indicate something would be a required "area" but I'd probably be OK with trade off.
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
10 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
I'm putting the keywords Quick Search and Omnibox, Omni box and Omni Search in this comment for future reference when we go trying to find this.
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
This would be a wonderful addition for power users of the Leap and offer a nice transition for power users of the desktop client.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
This would be lovely to have in Leap! Along with an icon or glyph to clear the entry, which would improve upon the staff desktop client experience.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesWes Osborn
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
I also wish we could bypass the workstation portion all together. I wonder if allowing us to pass in a branch and workstation via the URL could also be considered.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
50 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
It would be great to have this type of feature - even better if it supported regex. It is one of the items that prevents us from moving fully to hosted because this is something we can do via SQL Updates today.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Or make this information available via an API so we can monitor it using our own 3rd party monitoring tools.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
This would be very important to us. We've been working on ways to make our series more accessible and only showing some series information will limit Vega's adoption for our organization.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesWes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Wes Osborn
commented
Although this isn't as slick, you can use simplyreports to create reports that would contain this data that could be scheduled to run and then sent to a 3rd party.
What specifically are you attempting to do with the comparison? Get a list of records from one that isn't in the other or vice-versa? It might be better to do some searches to provide you with the results that you're looking for.