Settings and activity
114 results found
-
7 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Updating the request based on customer discussion with product to clarify the purpose of the enhancement.
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Mats Nordstrom
commented
Ideally Innovative fixes the problem with having multiple z-fields in Sierra so that notices gets sent to more than one e-mail address in the future. Our library uses IMMS and that system integration handles seperate z-fields just fine for sending out hold-notices to more than one e-mail address.
While we wait for that fix I agree that patrons shouldn´t be able to add more e-mail addresses in Vega.
It will most likely be quite confusing for our patrons that hold notices sends to more than one address while other notices doesn´t. (We haven´t gone live with Vega yet.)
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Mats Nordstrom
supported this idea
·
Yes, make it so please.