Settings and activity
241 results found
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
This is crucial for our consortium where not every library offers borrow by mail
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
134 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Having subsequent instances of the MARC 505 Contents note display in Vega is critical for music CDs - we have multiple support tickets from our libraries asking why the full contents are not displaying. This should be pulled out as a MUST HAVE, and the rest of these can be optional based on what most libraries want.
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
We have a lot of older records that only have info in the 511 fields and not the 7xx fields. While we realize that's not accurate, we would appreciate having the 511 field indexed so that those records can be retrieved in searches too. We would also like the 505 fields and 500 fields indexed too.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Our bug is that for a record such as one pictured in the screenshot where there IS volume info entered in the item record and the bib. record IS cataloged as a Serial, it still never prompts the user to select which volume they want, regardless of which Place Hold button is used.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
14 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
12 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Details on items going in-transit, enroute, and/or transferred are not kept within the Polaris Transactions database. Instead, the data is only kept within the Polaris database. This means if an item is deleted, then statistics on it going in-transit/transferred/enroute are lost. The enhancement request here would be to include that information into the Polaris Transactions database.
This could also serve as a generic enhancement request for increased reporting abilities within Simply Reports. It seems there are a lot of things our libraries would like reports on that are not possible to create within Simply Reports. It almost always involves historical circulation data.
-
10 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
.JPG){kind=link}
Having to input this info 3 times (ILS, Vega, App) is tiresome and could be avoided with this feature.