Settings and activity
248 results found
-
12 votes
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
18 votes
I apologize for the erroneous update. The change we made in Nov/Dec of 2024 did not actually deliver the requested functionality in this idea request. Changing status back to Under Review.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
This work is a part of: https://portal.productboard.com/iii/15-vega-product-portal/c/980-notes-are-indexed-for-search which is work being done in Q2 of 2025
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
53 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Having to input this info 3 times (ILS, Vega, App) is tiresome and could be avoided with this feature.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
This is crucial for our consortium where not every library offers borrow by mail
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
150 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Having subsequent instances of the MARC 505 Contents note display in Vega is critical for music CDs - we have multiple support tickets from our libraries asking why the full contents are not displaying. This should be pulled out as a MUST HAVE, and the rest of these can be optional based on what most libraries want.
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
We have a lot of older records that only have info in the 511 fields and not the 7xx fields. While we realize that's not accurate, we would appreciate having the 511 field indexed so that those records can be retrieved in searches too. We would also like the 505 fields and 500 fields indexed too.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
Our bug is that for a record such as one pictured in the screenshot where there IS volume info entered in the item record and the bib. record IS cataloged as a Serial, it still never prompts the user to select which volume they want, regardless of which Place Hold button is used.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
15 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
This is critical for us as a consortium, since as it stands, our libraries can't construct a new titles saved list, since it includes items that are not new for them or in some cases roll-ups where they don't even own the version of the edition that is new in that case. Please allow for this option for consortia!