Skip to content
Innovative Idea Exchange

Settings and activity

97 results found

  1. 103 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  2. 70 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  3. 129 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Vega Program  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  5. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alison Hoffman commented  · 

    I will echo Mike's comment. In a consortia of independent member libraries, where each library has different configurations at the branch level, the patron account features, especially the options to edit a patron's account, need to be set at the collection site level and honor the Polaris PAC settings. As the functionality currently stands, the results are confusing for users and essentially unusable.

    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  6. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alison Hoffman commented  · 

    The ability for users to register online became very important a few years ago, and more and more libraries are relying on it.

    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  7. 48 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alison Hoffman commented  · 

    Indexing these fields is important to provide access to the contents of an item when multiple works are contained within a single item.

    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  8. 46 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  9. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We actually added an endpoint to support this integration in Polaris 7.6 (BibsPost). We've been working with BTCat to consume the endpoint in their application.


    I'm going to set this to "Planned" for now because the integration is not live with BTCat yet. But the development piece required for Polaris has been done. Please let BTCat know you are interested!!

    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  10. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  11. 51 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  12. 47 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  13. 56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alison Hoffman commented  · 

    Due to the risk of data loss, we cannot consider Leap offline a viable option at this time. Not relying on saved data in the browser cache would be a significant improvement.

    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  14. 84 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    PLANNED  ·  10 comments  ·  Vega Discover  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Alison Hoffman commented  · 

    This is critical for consortia. We need more granularity in access. We need the ability to set up accounts for member libraries that limit access to ONLY being able to edit their library's home page. These library specific accounts should have no access to another library's Collection Site or Kiosk and no access to the main admin site. We at the consortia level should be able to access all admin functions for the central site as well as be able to edit all libraries' collection sites, kiosks, and admin functions.

    When it comes to showcase permissions, we also need to be able to limit which showcases admin access allows an individual library's account to edit.

    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  15. 27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  16. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
  17. 74 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Alison Hoffman supported this idea  · 
1 2 3 5 Next →