Settings and activity
465 results found
-
64 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
36 votesUNDER REVIEW · 5 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
35 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
16 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
58 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
7 votesUNDER REVIEW ·
AdminAngela Nolet (Senior Product Manager, Innovative Interfaces, Innovative) responded
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
Lynn Reynish supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lynn Reynish commented
Yes... using the same table for both patrons and items makes no sense. As Eleanor notes, we could use the field in item records to free up collection codes but not if it adds to the languages available to patrons!
This is a necessary feature - but we'd like such a feature to include the option for customers to record their own name. No automatic system can correctly pronounce every name that is presented to it. Our customers really appreciate the ability to "teach" the system how to say their name and miss it when that functionality isn't available.