Settings and activity
565 results found
-
25 votes
Kathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
82 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
159 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Kathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Kathryn Brew
commented
This would also be very helpful when giving all our staff the new "vega/staff user" accounts instead of "patron user" accounts. We have created a lot of showcases attached to our personal library cards, and with the new vega-specific admin accounts, it will be a pain to recreate all those showcases.
Transferring ownership or even creating a system where showcases can be shared rather than credited to an individual would be nice. In a consortium, we would need to be able to group users by library, and then they could have shared control over showcases created within their group, or something like that.
Kathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesKathryn Brew
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Kathryn Brew
commented
I agree. I'm not a cataloger so I don't know the MARC fields exactly, but I dislike these "series" that are really usually some kind of collection. That seems fundamentally different than a literary series/serialized storytelling/etc. It's annoying not just because the information is incorrect but also because it could be there in place of the actual series that the work is part of.
If it can't be distinguished, I'd rather just not have the series link, at least not on the main search results display where it isn't labelled. I have had a patron complain that they thought they were requesting the thing they saw right there. That's not user error, but a design flaw.
In a consortium, it would be very useful to have a system level as well as library level (and branch level below that). I would want this ability for all notice types, so that different consortia can choose to send any or all notice types from the system as opposed to from members, according to what makes sense in their context. Additionally, having a functionality in which the individual consortia members can choose to use or copy+modify the system-level notifications would be ideal. Not all libraries want to do their own emails (from scratch, or at all).