Settings and activity
46 results found
-
26 votes
Lori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
13 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
56 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
shared this idea
·
-
54 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
shared this idea
·
-
76 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
75 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesLori Smith-Hoogasian
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
This "on order" display has been a problem for us as well. We usually suppress item records that are getting withdrawn until we gather monthly statistics before batch deleting them. When no items are available, Vega seems to look for any attached order --even if that order was received years ago. I like this enhancement request but see a potential problem. We want our newly received orders to be available for placing holds even if item records have not been created yet.