Settings and activity
241 results found
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
81 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
There are many examples of when the name of an author/contributor as pictured on the item, listed in the 245 $c, is different from the version in the authorized 1xx or 7xx field. As such, the 245 $c needs to be indexed for searching, since that is what patrons are more likely to search by - they have no idea about authorized versions of names in LC, much less what they would be for any given author/contributor. Additionally, a recent example illustrated to us that even when they are very close to what the authorized name is, they could still miss finding what they need - searching "AJ Pearce" as pictured on the item doesn't retrieve the same results as when searching "A. J. Pearce", which is the authorized version. A patron wouldn't know this.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
13 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
41 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
This will be resolved when we roll out our new Account Portal.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
31 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Margaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
36 votesUNDER REVIEW · 0 comments · ILS - Polaris » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Margaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
9 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
shared this idea
·
-
15 votes
I apologize for the erroneous update. The change we made in Nov/Dec of 2024 did not actually deliver the requested functionality in this idea request. Changing status back to Under Review.
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesMargaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Margaret Rose O'Keefe
commented
This is critical for us as a consortium, since as it stands, our libraries can't construct a new titles saved list, since it includes items that are not new for them or in some cases roll-ups where they don't even own the version of the edition that is new in that case. Please allow for this option for consortia!
Margaret Rose O'Keefe
supported this idea
·
Definitely! We have a lot of older records that don't have summaries, but sometimes Syndetics will have those summaries instead, and in the old PAC, patrons could see those Syndetics summaries. We have Syndetics Unbound in both places, so I'm not sure why we can't see summaries in Vega.