Settings and activity
34 results found
-
2 votes
Molly Komp
shared this idea
·
-
37 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
63 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
109 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Molly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Molly Komp
commented
This would be important for our consortium, as not all libraries utilize the UDFs we've created. Our staff would like more flexibility, overall, to remove those fields they do not utilize to cut down on staff anxiety when creating records.
Molly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
In a Consortium Environment, Have Home Library Float to the Top of Availability in Catalog Item Page
16 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment Molly Komp
commented
Consortium here, and agree! This would a very nice feature to have for our patrons.
Molly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Molly Komp
commented
In addition to having this as a filter in simply reports, it would be nice to add this to the Find Tool as a field to search for patron records.
Molly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesMolly Komp
shared this idea
·
-
103 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Molly Komp
commented
For our libraries, when an item has been claimed returned, we essentially are giving the patron, and staff, more time to locate the item. If it is found, they check it in and it is removed from the patron's claimed section. We don't want these items sitting indefinitely. We would like the system to age these items to Lost and bill the patron after X amount of days. This would alleviate any extra steps staff would need to take in running reports and manually updating the record and item. But I agree it would be nice to have this a "turn on" or "off" feature in Admin and when on, set those limits within. Similar to how it worked in Sierra.
Molly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Molly Komp
commented
I would like to add to this, unless there is another idea I missed..., that staff be able to add more in terms of Bib records fields for the columns.
This may be hard to do, but the BIB results don't give staff everything they need to see and the Item results don't give them the combination of BIB and Item info they want to see in the results. I don't know how this would be done, but would be helpful for staff.
-
32 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Molly Komp
commented
Yes, this is very frustrating to our staff when they check out to a patron and THEN are notified that there are holds to pickup. It should appear upon scanning the patron card/opening the record so staff and/or patrons can go grab those holds to check out altogether.
Molly Komp
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesMolly Komp
supported this idea
·
Depending on the library, and the book club determines how they place their holds. Yes, the record set method is nice, however, it does not work well for when you need multiple formats of a title and end up placing holds on all patron records in the record set for every format needed. Staff would like to ability to say "I need 8 copies for this LP bib, 6 copies of this book bib and 4 copies of the audiobook bib" on one internal card so they can provide them to patrons as they show up.