Skip to content
Innovative Idea Exchange
← ILS - Sierra

How can we improve Sierra?

'Choose Priority between Item-level holds queue and bib-level holds queue' has been merged into this idea

ILS - Sierra: Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment

Categories

Recently Activity

ILS - Polaris Updated

Include Home branch and Hold Limited to Pickup at as part of 852/949 Embedded holdings field/MARC subfield mapping in import profiles

Cataloging & Metadata Management UNDER REVIEW

ILS - Polaris Updated

Make Ability to Replace Bib Records Permission Based

Cataloging & Metadata Management UNDER REVIEW

ILS - Polaris Updated

Exclude from Bulk Add to PO report warning on other libraries 970s if setting to Filter branches in line-item is on

Acquisitions, Serials & Inventory Management UNDER REVIEW

ILS - Polaris Updated

Clerk Codes for Circulation Staff

Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment UNDER REVIEW

ILS - Polaris Updated

Do not collapse fields with multiple lines of text

Cataloging & Metadata Management ALREADY SUPPORTED

ILS - Polaris Updated

Leap Patron Import - there should be a log accessible when an import fails.

Customer Relationship & Account Management UNDER REVIEW

ILS - Polaris Updated

Remove the dashed line around library card in Express Check

Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment UNDER REVIEW

Don't see your product?

Visit the ExLibris Idea Exchange

Including Alma, Primo, Summon and more

Visit the ProQuest Idea Exchange

Including Ebook Central, PQ Dissertations and Theses and more

Choose Priority between Item-level holds queue and bib-level holds queue

More control over choosing priority between the item-level holds queue and the bibliographic-level holds manually so that the Processing department can pull back specific items on popular, high-volume holds with more ease.

6 votes

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We’ll send you updates on this idea

Meghan Casey shared this idea  ·   ·  Report…  ·  Admin →
How important is this to you?

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close
Submitting...
An error occurred while saving the comment
  • Meghan Casey commented  ·   ·  Report

    More control over choosing priority between the item-level holds queue and the bibliographic-level holds manually so that the Processing department can pull back specific items on popular, high-volume holds with more ease.