More control over choosing priority between the item-level holds queue and the bibliographic-level holds manually so that the Processing department can pull back specific items on popular, high-volume holds with more ease.

3 votes

Meghan Casey shared this idea · Oct 25, 2023 · Report… · Admin →

UNDER REVIEW · Dec 8, 2023

An error occurred while saving the comment

How can we improve Sierra?

Feedback

ILS - Sierra: Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

Searching…

Recently Activity

branch level notice messaging in LX Starter

Allow the update of the contact method when editing an email of a hard bounce that has changed the method to phone.

Include Individual Plus Total Costs in Bills

We need more Admin users than 2.

Allow for automatic renewals when a hold is frozen

Allow staff to toggle between printing and not printing a date due slip

Please add Ulverscroft Limited to Polaris Libraries EDI suppliers

Don't see your product?

Visit the ExLibris Idea Exchange

Visit the ProQuest Idea Exchange

Choose Priority between Item-level holds queue and bib-level holds queue

ILS - Sierra: Circulation, Access Services & Fulfillment

Categories

Searching…

Recently Activity

branch level notice messaging in LX Starter

Allow the update of the contact method when editing an email of a hard bounce that has changed the method to phone.

Include Individual Plus Total Costs in Bills

We need more Admin users than 2.

Allow for automatic renewals when a hold is frozen

Allow staff to toggle between printing and not printing a date due slip

Please add Ulverscroft Limited to Polaris Libraries EDI suppliers

Don't see your product?

Visit the ExLibris Idea Exchange

Visit the ProQuest Idea Exchange

Choose Priority between Item-level holds queue and bib-level holds queue

We're glad you're here

We're glad you're here

We're glad you're here