Settings and activity
195 results found
-
27 votes
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Please comment on the following options for a Site Level Showcase Management feature:
What is the Problem we're solving and why?
Vega Consortia Libraries and Multi-Library Organizations would like to be able to manage showcase admin access by site. Site Level Showcase Admin Users should be able to quickly filter available showcases to those created in their Collection Site as well as retain view and use access to all showcases created by librarians in their organization.
Job Stories:
- As a Site Admin, I can assign Showcase Creators and Admins for specific sites, that are limited to creating and editing showcases in a particular site(s).
- As a Site Admin or Content Admin User, I can use the Home Page tools to filter, view, search, and find showcases that were made in the current Collection Site I am editing the Home Page display for.
- As a Site Level Showcase Creator or Admin,…
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
44 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
commented
The current "record locked" message frequently appears in workflows unrelated to fines, causing ongoing staff confusion.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
76 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
commented
This sounds like a great improvement for our big consortium. It is similar to features in Encore and WebPAC that our patrons like and use.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
commented
The current generic default cost leads to patrons being overcharged for items with values significantly below the default. For instance, our default book cost is $25. Consequently, if a patron pays online without contacting their library, they could pay $25 for a paperback that the owning library values at only $7.99.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
%20(1).png){kind=link}
%20(1).png){kind=link}
This enhancement would greatly increase our efficiency and provide significant benefits to the entire consortium. For titles with over 20 bibliographic entries, such as any work by Jane Austen, the ability to batch export all associated Bib IDs would simplify the process of identifying and correcting data errors within those records.