Settings and activity
196 results found
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the Innovative product team for consideration in planning the upcoming product roadmap.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
commented
The current "record locked" message frequently appears in workflows unrelated to fines, causing ongoing staff confusion.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
70 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
commented
This sounds like a great improvement for our big consortium. It is similar to features in Encore and WebPAC that our patrons like and use.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesNicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
commented
The current generic default cost leads to patrons being overcharged for items with values significantly below the default. For instance, our default book cost is $25. Consequently, if a patron pays online without contacting their library, they could pay $25 for a paperback that the owning library values at only $7.99.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicole Turzillo
commented
We manually clear this field system-wide every month, retaining the last patron number for 90 days. A more flexible solution would be to automatically clear this field based on a site-specific retention period.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
The product team will review this idea for consideration for a future release.
Nicole Turzillo
supported this idea
·
%20(1).png){kind=link}
%20(1).png){kind=link}
This enhancement would greatly increase our efficiency and provide significant benefits to the entire consortium. For titles with over 20 bibliographic entries, such as any work by Jane Austen, the ability to batch export all associated Bib IDs would simplify the process of identifying and correcting data errors within those records.