Settings and activity
200 results found
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
80 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Can this be combined with https://ideas.iii.com/forums/951766/suggestions/48644756?
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
I am not even going to bother telling staff (and patrons) that they can search by call number, because the requirement to enter a call number in its entirety is pretty ridiculous. It needs to work like it does in classic WebPAC - it's an index, part of the drop-down choices, and you can search for partial.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Can this be combined with 48653132 - https://ideas.iii.com/forums/951766/suggestions/48653132
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Currently it is not obvious that you can search by call number. I think library patrons, especially staff and power users (who continue to use the Classic because of the perceived lack of this option), are going to look for that.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Yes, if this could be wrapped into the bookshelf/your account improvements, that would be great. You sign in, you can remove already read/reading history titles from your results and in your reading history, rate the item (5 stars). These are options our patrons expect.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
We try and replace old records with OCLC when we are repairing or notice, but that's a task that will never be finished. Having summary information would be helpful.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Edit Hold makes complete sense.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Yet another function available in the old catalog but not Vega. If you have a lot of holds, this is a lot of clicking to deal with.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Can this be combined with https://ideas.iii.com/forums/951766/suggestions/48574910
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
This is how your average person searches, they know it's number X in the series. You should be able to search Dog Man 6 and get it. When I do that, I get nothing. Can only search "everything" or "series" for Dog Man and then have to scroll through or try sorting by newest to oldest to find it.
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Yes, this is how it works in the old WebPAC. You get a message, "Request denied - already on hold for or checked out to you" (doesn't appear to be in the messages.conf file). You'd think it would work that way in the more advanced catalog...
Alison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Sierra/WebPAC had the somewhat lame preferred search option, so you'd get an email alert when something you tagged (author, subject) was added to the collection, but very rudimentary. I would like a better version of that, but not for holds to be placed automatically. My concern is about the build up of holds (which people forget about). Definitely make it optional to place a hold automatically (option for library to make that an available option for patron, who must opt-in).
-
22 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
For staff users, correct? At least if the Knowledge Base pointed to what support provided me in a ticket about this:
When you get a question about a cover image, start by right-clicking on the cover image and selecting "Open image in new tab." The image's URL will then display in the browser bar. Check whether it includes a UPC, because Syndetics will use the UPC first. If there's just an ISBN, and the ISBN is correct, and it's still showing the wrong cover, then that's reportable to Syndetics. And yes, you can send them an email to get their data corrected. See "Data Corrections" on this page.
https://proquest.syndetics.com/contact/
Please send an email at syndetics.corrections@proquest.com and make sure to include the ISBN/UPC/ISSN/EAN of the title in question.
-
22 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Agree with Eileen!
-
23 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesAlison Pruntel
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Alison Pruntel
commented
Doesn't this depend on your Location hierarchy settings (under Settings | Library defaults | Location hierarchy)? We have Level 1 as Branch and Level 2 as Shelf Location and thus that displays as expected. Maybe that doesn't work for Consortiums that have at least 3 levels?
This appears to be working as expected - clicking next takes you to the top of the next page.