Settings and activity
113 results found
-
69 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
It would also be nice to see Authority records added to the view. If we want to go all out, maybe even an option in settings to determine which types of records go there for the user and an option for a compact view so you could get more entries in the list without scrolling.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
9 votes
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
95 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
This is such a pervasive but under the radar problem that undermines people's trust in the library to fulfill their request.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
42 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
It would also be great if it were just harder to place item level holds. Either make it a permission or add a pop-up "are you sure" when placing an item level hold. We've got a couple of hundred "Not Supplied" holds in our system that are likely just instances of staff doing the wrong thing, placing an item level hold on an item that goes to lost.
-
18 votes
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
49 votes
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
Yes, this would be great! And it would help reduce the number of reports that we get saying that an image can't be found or loaded for a particular title.
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
Deleting them would be tough from a system design perspective, but finding a way to hide them would be great!
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
You might also want to comment on this: https://portal.productboard.com/iii/6-innovative-product-status-board-new/c/932-additional-acquisitions-links-
If needed, you could also use this SQL in the item find tool:
SELECT
DISTINCT cir.ItemRecordID
FROM
Polaris.polaris.PurchaseOrders po WITH (NOLOCK)
JOIN
Polaris.polaris.POLines pol WITH (NOLOCK) ON po.PurchaseOrderID = pol.PurchaseOrderID
JOIN
Polaris.polaris.POLineItemSegments polis WITH (NOLOCK) ON pol.POLineItemID = polis.POLineItemID
JOIN
Polaris.polaris.LineItemSegmentToItemRecord lisir WITH (NOLOCK) ON polis.POLineItemSegmentID = lisir.POLineItemSegmentID
JOIN
Polaris.polaris.CircItemRecords cir WITH (NOLOCK) ON lisir.ItemRecordID = cir.ItemRecordID
WHERE
po.PONumber = 'YourPONumberHere' -
9 votes
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
42 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
This would be a very big CARROT to the sticks we're typically presenting to members for switching away from the desktop client. If they could quickly switch branches ONLY in Leap that would be a game changer. Even better if they didn't have to pick workstations.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
Maybe one way of getting more delivery type information on the receipts would be to have a Printed Name in the branch record. Currently, there is a Display Name, if a Printed Name could be added that would be a helpful place to include the needed delivery/sorting information. That would mirror how InnReach works.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
13 votes
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Wes Osborn
shared this idea
·
-
18 votes
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Wes Osborn
commented
It is wild to think that this date could be updated by anything other than a SQL Update. It shouldn't be exposed in any API or 3rd party integration.
Wes Osborn
supported this idea
·
Moving my importance level up a bit - it is SOOO annoying to lose the recent records when you're working to troubleshoot a problem/issue!