Settings and activity
222 results found
-
31 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
2 votesUNDER REVIEW · 1 comment · ILS - Sierra » Acquisitions, Serials & Item/Issue/Inventory Management · Admin →Shawn P. Farrell shared this idea ·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn P. Farrell supported this idea · -
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn P. Farrell commentedAn option like this seems essential. If reporting on blocks, bounces, & other delivery outcomes is to truly be actionable in LX Starter, we need to have a way to be able to resolve delivery problems that doesn't put any undesirable demands on our patrons.
Shawn P. Farrell supported this idea · -
9 votesShawn P. Farrell shared this idea ·
-
5 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
5 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
14 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn P. Farrell commentedAssuming Link+ is your local name for Inn-Reach?
This would definitely be a welcome addition. I see it as something comparable to Sierra's Max Item A-D, but for holds instead of checkouts, allowing libraries more flexibility in establishing borrowing & request limits, especially now that so many of us have gone fine-free & might be looking for ways to better regulate what customers are allowed to borrow.
Granted, allowing more than just the 4 A-D limit options for checkouts would also be most welcome!
Shawn P. Farrell supported this idea · -
12 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
18 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
9 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
29 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
This idea will be reviewed by the product management team for consideration in an upcoming release.
Shawn P. Farrell shared this idea · -
9 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
13 votesShawn P. Farrell shared this idea ·
-
20 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
The product manager will review this idea for possible inclusion in a future release.
Shawn P. Farrell supported this idea · -
2 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
-
2 votesShawn P. Farrell supported this idea ·
Agreed. When we asked about this during a recent implementation planning discussion, staff suggested it was current absent for privacy concerns, but didn't seem particularly convincing, either to us or themselves.