Settings and activity
16 results found
-
39 votes
Nina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
30 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
We will consider this idea for possible future development. Thank you!
Nina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
76 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nina Acosta
commented
The current rollups do not give users enough information to select the version they want. If they are looking for specific editions with particular people involved, like translators or illustrators, these are difficult to identify, unless they know the publisher or year of publication of the version they want. Subfield $c would provide context that is more intuitive for patrons.
-
13 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
93 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nina Acosta
commented
In a consortium, we have several resources where different links are intended for different patron types for accessing electronic resources. The link text often does not make it clear which link to use, making it frustrating for our users to connect to the appropriate link and authenticate for the resources they should have access to. Our notes make it clear which links will grant access for each patron, and we would like these to display to our users.
I've included a screenshot of one of our entries.
-
56 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nina Acosta
commented
The details section often does not include enough information to help users select the edition they want, especially when looking for classic titles with dozens of iterations.
The differences that matter to them are often the additional contributors like the narrator, translator, or illustrator. They don't necessarily know which edition they need from the publishing info displayed.This is particularly confusing when the user has performed a search using the contributor's name and retrieved a result, but the rollups make it unclear which editions are relevant to their search.
Nina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
https://portal.productboard.com/iii/15-vega-product-portal/c/869-meep-enhancement-winner-use-ils-bib-record-lists-for-showcase-creation
Nina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nina Acosta
commented
It would be very helpful if we could copy a site or set up a template to use instead of reconfiguring each one individually.
Nina Acosta
supported this idea
·
-
136 votesNina Acosta
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nina Acosta
commented
It is not intuitive for users to type in a location to search for their library that is too far down the list to display. Please show all location results and put them in alphabetical order.
For libraries that limit the number of items a user may borrow at one time, this would make it easier for patrons to count what they currently have out to determine if additional checkouts are permitted.