This would make a large difference in functionality. It's much more than an aesthetic improvement.

Agreed! Even staff use the location filter frequently and it would be so much nicer to have it next to the availabilty filter.

Yes, people in our consortium have consistently wanted the locations filter higher and more obvious. It would be good if the site settings allowed for the order of the filters to be customized.

Patrons are confused about Availability and Locations filters--they believe there's no way to search for items available at specific libraries. I would love to have the option to move locations up near the top of the filter lists, below "Availability" so that patrons can see the filters grouped together.

Please incorporate this enhancement in future iterations. Thank you.

This is an important enhancement request. It's more than 2 years old and should be addressed asap. Thanks.

Other products offer this ability (and include Facet by AR level, and by eContent provider, both of which are extremely helpful in our community)

Reordering facets by site is incredibly valuable in consortia as we would prefer location on top, but even standalone sites may prefer a different order. People want to be able to see what is available at their location, (branch or site) and finding the location facet near the bottom doesn't help save the user time, and can be frustrating.

This is a super important function. We are part of a consortia and would like to have location at the top and always expanded so patrons can easily toggle between the whole system and just our branch, particularly for our kiosk site. It would also be great if the "apply" button was at the top of the filters instead of having to scroll through the whole list after making a selection.

For consortial sites, this is absolutely critical so that we can move LOCATION facet to to the top so patrons can see what is at the library they are near.

Customers are finding the facets to be not useful. We think that being able to order the ones to be most important to them at the top would improve this.

Yes we would like to be able reorder our facets too

REQUEST: Add a setting at the collection site level that allows libraries to reorder facets. (they can be different on each collection site)

FEATURE DETAILS: 

Job Stories: 
As a Vega Admin, Main Site Admin, or Site Admin, I can choose the Order of Facets in sites I administrate. 

Acceptance Criteria: 
The Facets Administration page in Vega Discover Staff UI is updated to allow for Admins to reorder the facets to a custom order. 
A Facets Administration page is added to the Site Level, allowing sites to set their own priority for facet order and to decide which facets appear in the site. To set a site level facet selection and priority toggle is set allowing editing of the default Main Vega Facet configuration. 
The Main Vega Facets selection and order is applied to sites unless an override has been configured. 

This idea came from: https://ideas.iii.com/forums/951766-vega-discover/suggestions/47076409-facet-navigation-and-display-improvements
https://ideas.iii.com/forums/951766-vega-discover/suggestions/47318573-select-order-of-facets-in-refine-panel-display

Yes, this would be helpful!

This feature would be really helpful to patrons and staff when searching the catalog.

Just got another request from staff to re-order the facets. This would be a very helpful option.

We would like to be able to customize the order of the facets, prioritizing the fields our patrons gravitate to first. This would be extremely beneficial to our patrons when they are searching our catalog.

We would like to have this ability, as the location facet displays fairly low in the list in Vega, but our patrons are used to seeing the locations up near the top - and it really makes most sense for it to be near the top, as where the item is located can be quite important to the patron.

Libraries are not all created with the same needs and priorities. A standalone library and a consortia may have different reasons to move a facet into a higher slot.

Finding your location isnt intuitive based on the search results, some facets just make more sense when listed alphabetically. It isnt obvious to patrons why their library isnt appearing when the list looks random.