Settings and activity
171 results found
-
51 votes
Reviewing this idea for future development.
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
We will consider this idea for possible future development. Thank you!
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
59 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Young
commented
I agree with the comments above. Leap offline is not a reliable solution for our library. We need a better way to work offline without risking our transactions.
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
42 votesEric Young
shared this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Young
commented
We need to exclude locations by default and instead drive visitors to a collection site specifically branded for the material at that location.
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
We actually added an endpoint to support this integration in Polaris 7.6 (BibsPost). We've been working with BTCat to consume the endpoint in their application.
I'm going to set this to "Planned" for now because the integration is not live with BTCat yet. But the development piece required for Polaris has been done. Please let BTCat know you are interested!!
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Young
commented
I completely agree with the idea of integrating BTCat and Polaris. The ability to “push” records from BTCat directly into Polaris would greatly streamline the cataloging process for libraries. It would eliminate the need for manual export/import of records and make the transition away from the Polaris desktop client much smoother. This integration would be a valuable addition for libraries and would improve their efficiency in managing bibliographic records.
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
We will consider this idea for possible future development. Thank you!
Eric Young
shared this idea
·
-
64 votes
This will be a part of the Renewal Journey feature
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesEric Young
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Reviewing this idea for possible future development.
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesEric Young
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesEric Young
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
We will consider this idea for possible future development. Thank you!
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesEric Young
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
We are planning on limiting soft bounces this quarter (Q3 2023).
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Young
commented
Our trust in the reports has always been low due to these very reasons. Improving these resources is a must. We end up writing our own with slight modification to fix the output based on testing for accuracy. Please fix these resources.
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Young
commented
This is really important at the start of going live with LX Starter to help clean up records that may have not been well kept from a Polaris notice perspective.
Eric Young
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesEric Young
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesEric Young
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesEric Young
supported this idea
·
I like the idea of being able to push design blocks to related notices, but I don't think the notices know what design block was used. I do like having design blocks that are not touching related notices for editing and what not, so please don't change that separation. It is not too difficult to go and edit each notice, it would just save time if we could push the design block to related notices.
Note: I do have a design block that contains text for each notice, and I add the block and erase the non-relevant text for the notice. This helped me not have to have 6+ different design blocks just because the text was different.