Settings and activity
49 results found
-
13 votes
Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesEric Lozauskas
shared this idea
·
-
16 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
I second the idea of an overlayed "Not owned" verbiage, and if clicking on the item pre-populated a collection addition request to the patron's registered library - that would be slick!
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
I feel like this could be piggybacked on the cover image changing based on selection of PS4, PS5, Xbox, etc. for games. Same type of concept with possibly a single solution fixing both.
Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesUNDER REVIEW ·
AdminAngela Nolet
(Senior Product Manager, Innovative Interfaces, Innovative)
responded
Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
Yes, please give us the ability for this request to go to the patron's registered home library and not a central email account. Thanks!
Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
A "Duplicate" feature would be great... Thanks in advance from someone with 40+ libraries :-).
Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
Yes, ideally if there were a checkbox option for each collection site called "Include in Library Navigation" that would add that collection site to a dropdown list for toggling between multiple collection sites, that would be awesome. Thanks for the consideration!
-
5 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
100% agree with Kathryn's preferences. This is much needed for consortium/multi-branch/location customers.
Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
Yes, this would be really handy for our consortium as well! Plus, staff frequently will call another member library to confirm availability or ask them to pull the item aside for a patron who is on their way to that location. Ideas like this help make this information more readily available to those working at public desks. Thanks!
Eric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesEric Lozauskas
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Eric Lozauskas
commented
Yes, this should either be accurate (although I know it may be difficult when taking into accounts advantage+ collections, central collections, etc. for consortium customers), or suppress "0 copies" on eContent if the accurate number can't be determined.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Yes, the ability to pull additional field data on in-transit slips. Perhaps similar to user defined fields, we could have branch defined fields, a BDF so to speak. So that BDF1 could have a description of "Route" and contain a route number, and BDF2 could have a description of "Stop" and contain a stop number for delivery purposes. These fields could then be customizable by any customer for their needs and display purposes on a per branch basis on receipts or in other areas of the ILS.